Feature 17. VP-internal subject
found in question(s): 44a, 44b, 45a, 45b, 46a, 46b
Definition and illustration
It is generally assumed in generative syntax that subjects are generated within VP. In languages subject to the EPP-requirement, the subject has to vacate the VP and move to a designated subject position usually identified with Spec,TP (see also feature on the height of the subject). In languages without an EPP-requirement, on the other hand, the subject can remain inside the VP. This has been correlated with basic word order in that only VO-languages have been argued to be subject to the EPP. This makes predictions for VP-fronting: Concretely, in a language that has VP-fronting but no EPP, it should be possible for the fronted VP-constituent to contain the subject. The following example from German illustrates this possibility (see, e.g., Wurmbrand 2006, Haider 2010):
(1)
Ein Unglück geschehen wird in so einem Fall öfter.
a catastrophe happen will in such a case occasionally
'A catastrophe will occasionally occur in such a case.'
In a VO-language, which is subject to the EPP, this should not be possible, as shown by the following English example:
(2)
*Problems arise will there certainly not.
Questions 44-46 test different aspects of this prediction.
Correlations
Question 44 investigates whether the fronted VP can contain a passivized verb and its subject.
- Prediction 1: V-O → *[S+Vpass] fronting
- Prediction 2: O-V → [S+Vpass] fronting
Question 45 investigates whether the fronted VP can contain an unaccusative verb and its subject.
- Prediction 1: V-O → *[S+Vunacc] fronting
- Prediction 2: O-V → [S+Vunacc] fronting
Question 46 investigates whether the fronted VP can contain a transitive verb and its subject:
- Prediction 1: V-O → *[A+Vtrans] fronting
- Prediction 2: O-V → [A+Vtrans] fronting
In the approach by Fanselow (2020) that focuses solely on the EPP, the predictions are as follows for the questions above: Any language (whether OV or VO) subject to the EPP should disallow fronting of subject and verb:
- Prediction: EPP → *S+V fronting
See also
This feature is closely connected to several others that explore the consequences of the presence/absence of the EPP, i.e., 5, 7, 12, 13, 18.
References
Author(s) | Title | Year | Published in |
---|---|---|---|
Haider, Hubert | The syntax of German. | 2010 | Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
Wurmbrand, Susi | Licensing case. | 2006 | Journal of Germanic Linguistics 18(3). 175-236. |